81 F3d 1147 United States v. Colon

81 F.3d 1147

317 U.S.App.D.C. 191

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Johnny COLON, also known as Alcides Paz Badillo, Appellant.

No. 95-3120.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 9, 1996.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: SILBERMAN, ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's judgment of August 14, 1995, be affirmed. The district court's determination that appellant was not entitled to a downward adjustment for his mitigating role was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Olibrices, 979 F.2d 1557 (D.C.Cir.1992).

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.